A sale so good… you wet yourself?

It’s an interesting route to go down but this didn’t put off Harvey Nichols in their latest controversial advert.

You might remember their much ‘discussed’ christmas 2011 campaign that insinuated Harvey Nichols can turn a walk of shame into a stride of pride?


Well this one is reaches whole new level:

The thing with this latest campaign is it’s very easy to criticise. I mean, it’s a relatively expensive shop, with a high end target market to match, showing all their clothes soiled. It’s not a great start.

But criticising adverts doesn’t particularly interest me, it’s an extremely easy thing to do with the amount of awful bingo and PPI claims adverts around at the minute. What interests me is why?

Why did they risk this pretty predictable backlash?

Was it simply a case of running too fast, and too far, with an idea? The creative process is clear, albeit misjudged – we need a way to show excitement, what’s a way of doing that easily and cleverly? so excited you… pee yourself! Perfect! Was it a case of people being too close to the idea to step back and say ‘hang on, it’s a nice idea but completely wrong for the market?’

Or was this all a bit more intentional? Are they trying to adjust their target market for example? An advert with fairly strong connotations of incontinence is surely a way of losing a lot of their slightly senior shoppers’ support? Is this a way of trying to bring Harvey Nichols to the youth that appreciate a bit of toilet humour, don’t mind trying on clothes people may have wet themselves in and are accustomed to trawling through racks of dishevelled clothes in the hope of saving a fiver?

I’m not sure, but I think exploring an unsuccessful campaign in this way is a lot more useful than launching an outright criticism of it.


3 thoughts on “A sale so good… you wet yourself?

  1. I liked the walk of shame christmas campaign but I think this is a bit too far, seems too off-brand to me.. The christmas ad showed their products in a good light- that you should be proud to wear them on your ‘walk of shame’. But their new campaign doesn’t make me want to wear the clothes they’ve just wet themselves in…

    1. I completely agree! The christmas one was a bit daring but on the right side of it, still showed the clothes well and didn’t completely alienate half their audience. I feel like this is just trying to be shocking but taken it too far!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s